Rants
Deb Nun
This is what's important to me!
> > From: deb nun <debnun@sbcglobal.net>
> > Subject: Fw: Rory Olsen Blog
> > To: ESTATEPLANNING.LAW@TTU.EDU
> > Date: Thursday, March 4, 2010, 12:40 AM

How is a comment on the WWW any more 'Ex Parte' than the Will filed for probate by "posting", or all the hearings done at side bar??????

dn


> > >  > From: deb nun <debnun@sbcglobal.net>
> > > > > > > > Subject:
> > > > > > > > To: debnun@sbcglobal.net
> > > > > > > > Date: Tuesday, February
> 9,
> > 2010,
> > > 8:12
> > > > AM
> > > > > > > > HomeBiographyEx Parte!
> > > > > > > > February 8th, 2010 by
> Rory
> > Olsen
> > > > > > > > Over the last few days,
> a
> > lady who
> > > once
> > > > upon
> > > > > a
> > > > > > time
> > > > > > > had a
> > > > > > > > case in my court,
> didn’t
> > bother
> > > to
> > > > retain
> > > > > > counsel
> > > > > > > and then
> > > > > > > > lost her case, has been
> > posting
> > > > derogatory
> > > > > > comments
> > > > > > > about
> > > > > > > > me, my trip to Texas
> Tech,
> > my
> > > morals
> > > > and
> > > > > many
> > > > > > other
> > > > > > > things
> > > > > > > > in comments section of
> this
> > blog.
> > > Since
> > > > the
> > > > > > lady’s
> > > > > > > > acquaintance with
> standard
> > > English
> > > > usage,
> > > > > > spelling
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > grammar appears to have
> been
> > a
> > > brief
> > > > affair,
> > > > > over
> > > > > > far
> > > > > > > too
> > > > > > > > soon, some of her
> postings
> > have
> > > been
> > > > > > unintentionally
> > > > > > > > humorous.  As soon as
> she
> > posts
> > > one of
> > > > her
> > > > > off
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > wall
> > > > > > > > comments, I save it and
> then
> > take
> > > it
> > > > down.
> > > > > I
> > > > > > gather
> > > > > > > that she
> > > > > > > > is trying to get me to
> change
> > my
> > > ruling
> > > > in
> > > > > her
> > > > > > case.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Being lobbied like this
> is a
> > risk
> > > of
> > > > being
> > > > > a
> > > > > > judge. If
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > case were still open, I
> would
> > have
> > > to
> > > > > chastise
> > > > > > her at
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > minimum and perhaps hold
> her
> > in
> > > > contempt of
> > > > > > court. I
> > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > also have to disclose
> these
> > > contacts to
> > > > all
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > counsel and
> > > > > > > > pro-se parties.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Fortunately for everyone
> in
> > the
> > > > case–and
> > > > > > me–the
> > > > > > > case is
> > > > > > > > closed and the period
> for
> > filing
> > > a
> > > > motion
> > > > > for a
> > > > > > new
> > > > > > > trial is
> > > > > > > > long past, being thirty
> days
> > > under
> > > > Texas
> > > > > Rule of
> > > > > > > Civil
> > > > > > > > Procedure 329(b). When
> the
> > thirty
> > > days
> > > > came
> > > > > and
> > > > > > went,
> > > > > > > I lost
> > > > > > > > jurisdiction over the
> case.
> > So
> > > even if
> > > > I
> > > > > were so
> > > > > > > unethical
> > > > > > > > as to change my mind
> because
> > of
> > > an
> > > > Internet
> > > > > > stalker
> > > > > > > making
> > > > > > > > attempts to contact me
> ex
> > parte,
> > > I
> > > > > couldn’t do
> > > > > > > it!
> > > > > > > > Unless revived by a
> higher
> > court,
> > > the
> > > > case
> > > > > is
> > > > > > closed,
> > > > > > > over
> > > > > > > > and done with.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Being stalked on-line
> over a
> > case
> > > which
> > > > has
> > > > > long
> > > > > > > since
> > > > > > > > passed from my
> jurisdiction
> > and
> > > the
> > > > > judgment
> > > > > > become
> > > > > > > final is
> > > > > > > > rather humorous, isn’t
> it?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I hope that the stalker
> will
> > find
> > > more
> > > > > > productive
> > > > > > > outlets
> > > > > > > > for her energies in the
> > future,
> > > > thereby
> > > > > avoiding
> > > > > > > further
> > > > > > > > entanglements with
> the
> > legal
> > > system.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Posted in Uncategorized
> | No
> > > Comments
> > > > »
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Good Will Win in the
> End
> > > > > > > > Can a couple as
> mismatched as
> > they
> > > are
> > > > find
> > > > > > > happiness,
> > > > > > > > while living through a
> very
> > nasty
> > > > > reelection
> > > > > > campaign?
> > > > > > > Or
> > > > > > > > will they be
> > > > > > > > torn apart?
> > > > > > > > Read A Free Excerpt
> (PDF)
> > > > > > > > Buy the Book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Pages
> > > > > > > > BiographyArchives
> > > > > > > > February 2010January
> > 2010December
> > > > > 2009November
> > > > > > > 2009October
> > > > > > > > 2009September
> 2009August
> > 2009July
> > > > 2009June
> > > > > > 2009May
> > > > > > > 2009March
> > > > > > > > 2009February
> 2009January
> > > 2009December
> > > > > > 2008November
> > > > > > > > 2008October
> 2008September
> > > 2008August
> > > > > 2008July
> > > > > > > 2008June
> > > > > > > > 2008May 2008April
> 2008March
> > > > 2008February
> > > > > > 2008January
> > > > > > > > 2008December
> 2007November
> > > 2007October
> > > > > > 2007September
> > > > > > > > 2007August 2007July
> 2007June
> > > 2007May
> > > > > 2007April
> > > > > > > > 2007Categories
> > > > > > > > Uncategorized
> > > > > > > > Other Resources
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Weblog
> > ReviewBlogoriffic.com
> > > > Terrific
> > > > > blog
> > > > > > > directory
> > > > > > > > and blogger network
> > community.
> > > > > > > > All-Blogs.net
> directoryBlog
> > > Directory
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
Reply

Forward



Reply

|
deb nun
to me

show details Mar 14 (2 days ago)



--- On Fri, 3/5/10, deb nun <debnun@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> From: deb nun <debnun@sbcglobal.net>
> Subject: Fw: Rory Olsen Blog
> To: priscillawaltersforjudge@gmail.com
> Date: Friday, March 5, 2010, 7:38 PM
>
>
> --- On Thu, 3/4/10, deb nun <debnun@sbcglobal.net>
> wrote:
>
> > From: deb nun <debnun@sbcglobal.net>
> > Subject: Fw: Rory Olsen Blog
> > To: ESTATEPLANNING.LAW@TTU.EDU
> > Date: Thursday, March 4, 2010, 12:41 AM
> >
> >
> > I am so sick of politics! FWIW: My mother was a life
> long
> > republican!
> > dn
> >
> >
> ************************************************************************
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > HomeBiographyHave they no
> shame?
> > > > > > > January 23rd, 2010 by Rory
> Olsen
> > > > > > > The Houston Bar Association
> > conducts
> > > polls
> > > > of
> > > > > its
> > > > > > members
> > > > > > > in election years. The idea
> behind
> > the
> > > poll
> > > > is
> > > > > for
> > > > > > lawyers
> > > > > > > who have appeared before
> sitting
> > judges
> > > or
> > > > > worked
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > non-incumbent judicial
> candidates
> > to
> > > rate
> > > > the
> > > > > > qualifications
> > > > > > > of those running. Bar polls
> are
> > not
> > > truly
> > > > > > representative of
> > > > > > > lawyers, since membership in
> the
> > HBA
> > > tends
> > > > to be
> > > > > > > concentrated in lawyers with
> the
> > > larger
> > > > firms.
> > > > > Most
> > > > > > lawyers
> > > > > > > do not belong to it. It is
> not a
> > > randomly
> > > > > selected
> > > > > > poll.
> > > > > > > Rather, it is sent to all
> HBA
> > members.
> > > So
> > > > office
> > > > > > lawyers who
> > > > > > > never go to court can vote
> on
> > trial
> > > judges.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > To add to the confusion, the
> HBA
> > > always
> > > > makes a
> > > > > big
> > > > > > > production of the results of
> the
> > poll,
> > > > listing
> > > > > it
> > > > > > > prominently on their web site
> and
> > then
> > > > > distributing
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > results to the news media.
> Bar
> > polls
> > > are
> > > > > essentially
> > > > > > nothing
> > > > > > > more than an attempt to
> influence
> > the
> > > > voting
> > > > > public to
> > > > > > vote
> > > > > > > for judicial candidates liked
> by
> > > lawyers.
> > > > As
> > > > > anyone
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > half a brain knows, being
> liked
> > by
> > > lawyers
> > > > is
> > > > > not
> > > > > > > necessarily the same thing
> as
> > being a
> > > good
> > > > > judge.
> > > > > > Judges are
> > > > > > > elected to serve the public,
> not
> > the
> > > > lawyers.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The bar poll can be
> manipulated
> > by
> > > > candidates
> > > > > who
> > > > > > spend an
> > > > > > > inordinate amount of time
> and
> > > resources
> > > > visiting
> > > > > the
> > > > > > big law
> > > > > > > firms,  or spam the HBA
> > membership
> > > when
> > > > the
> > > > > polls
> > > > > > come
> > > > > > > out.  Unfortunately, as long
> as
> > the
> > > HBA
> > > > keeps
> > > > > > > conducting these
> pseudo-polls,
> > > candidates
> > > > will
> > > > > be
> > > > > > forced to
> > > > > > > endure the results of this
> > > ill-conceived
> > > > idea.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Today I received an e-mail,
> which
> > blew
> > > me
> > > > away in
> > > > > its
> > > > > > crass
> > > > > > > attempt to manipulate the
> bar
> > poll.
> > > Here is
> > > > what
> > > > > it
> > > > > > says in
> > > > > > > relevant part:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > January 21, 2010
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > TO: Members of the Harris
> County
> > Bar
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > FROM: Members of the
> Coalition of
> > > Harris
> > > > County
> > > > > > Democratic
> > > > > > > Elected Officials
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > “First, we are all proud to
> see
> > a
> > > broad
> > > > and
> > > > > > accomplished
> > > > > > > group of individuals filing
> as
> > Harris
> > > > County
> > > > > > Democratic
> > > > > > > candidates.  This spring,
> with
> > almost
> > > > forty
> > > > > judicial
> > > > > > > nominations being contested
> by
> > more
> > > than
> > > > seventy
> > > > > > Democratic
> > > > > > > candidates, and almost forty
> more
> > > > Democratic
> > > > > > candidates
> > > > > > > unopposed in their Primaries,
> it
> > is
> > > easy to
> > > > tell
> > > > > that
> > > > > > times
> > > > > > > are changing rapidly and the
> > two-party
> > > > system is
> > > > > once
> > > > > > again
> > > > > > > alive and well in Texas’
> most
> > > populous
> > > > county.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > “For more than six months,
> the
> > > members of
> > > > this
> > > > > new
> > > > > > > organization of
> > Democratic-elected
> > > officials
> > > > in
> > > > > > Harris
> > > > > > > County, many of whom are
> lawyers,
> > > sorted
> > > > through
> > > > > the
> > > > > > list of
> > > > > > > Primary candidates for
> judicial
> > posts
> > > on
> > > > our
> > > > > county
> > > > > > ballot,
> > > > > > > interviewed them, examined as
> best
> > we
> > > could
> > > > the
> > > > > extent
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > their legal experiences,
> their
> > reasons
> > > for
> > > > > offering
> > > > > > > themselves as candidates for
> the
> > > nominations
> > > > of
> > > > > our
> > > > > > Party
> > > > > > > and their strengths as
> potential
> > > jurists.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > “For your consideration,
> we
> > have
> > > listed
> > > > here
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > candidates we are
> recommending to
> > > > Democratic
> > > > > voters
> > > > > > … who
> > > > > > > are also our constituents …
> in
> > the
> > > > upcoming
> > > > > March
> > > > > > > Democratic Primary.  Because
> of
> > the
> > > great
> > > > > influence
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > Houston Bar Association’s
> poll
> > has on
> > > the
> > > > > opinions
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > local voters, we felt you
> might
> > > appreciate
> > > > having
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > results of our collective
> > thoughts.”
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Gag!  This blatant attempt
> at
> > > politicizing
> > > > what
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > supposed to be an honest
> > evaluation of
> > > the
> > > > > candidates
> > > > > > based
> > > > > > > upon the personal knowledge
> of
> > the
> > > > respondents
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > signed by its perpetrators,
> many
> > of
> > > whom are
> > > > not
> > > > > > > lawyers.  Their names are
> listed
> > > below.
> > > > Have
> > > > > they no
> > > > > > > shame?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Also, do they really think
> that
> > > lawyers
> > > > really
> > > > > care
> > > > > > about
> > > > > > > who a committee of elected
> > > > officials–lawyers
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > non-lawyers–think is
> qualified?
> > Most
> > > > lawyers
> > > > > are
> > > > > > too
> > > > > > > independent to be led by the
> nose
> > by a
> > > bunch
> > > > of
> > > > > > > politicians.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Obviously, the elected
> officials
> > who
> > > signed
> > > > this
> > > > > memo
> > > > > > want
> > > > > > > to decide who will win the
> > Democrat
> > > primary.
> > > > One
> > > > > must
> > > > > > assume
> > > > > > > that they do not trust the
> voters
> > to
> > > make
> > > > the
> > > > > right
> > > > > > > decision.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We Republicans would not do
> such
> > a
> > > thing. We
> > > > let
> > > > > the
> > > > > > voters
> > > > > > > decide.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I wonder if this is going to
> > backfire
> > > on
> > > > them.
> > > > > I
> > > > > > hope
> > > > > > > that it does!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Representative Senfronia
> Thompson
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Senator John Whitmire
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Commissioner El Franco Lee
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Constable Gary Freeman
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Senator Rodney Ellis
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Representative Garnet
> Coleman
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Congressman Gene Green
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Senator Mario Gallegos
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Congresswoman Sheila Jackson
> Lee
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Representative Jessica
> Farrar
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Commissioner Sylvia Garcia
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Representative Alma Allen
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Constable May Walker
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Representative Hubert Vo
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Representative Ana Hernandez
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Representative Ellen Cohen
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Representative Carol
> Alvarado
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Representative Armando Walle
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Posted in Uncategorized
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 3 Responses
> > > > > > DKNun
> > > > > > February 7th, 2010 at 5:32 pm
> > > > > >
> > > > > > “You Sir, are a hypocrit.”
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Madam,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Whatever faults I may have and
> > whatever
> > > misdeeds
> > > > I
> > > > > have
> > > > > > done, I am comforted by the fact
> that I
> > can
> > > at
> > > > least
> > > > > spell
> > > > > > common English words correctly.
> You
> > would
> > > be
> > > > well
> > > > > advised to
> > > > > > channel some of your surplus time
> and
> > > energy
> > > > into
> > > > > learning
> > > > > > the rudiments of the English
> language.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Good day!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rory
> > > > > >
> > > > > > DKNUN
> > > > > > February 7th, 2010 at 9:37 pm
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I sure hope you heard that
> SuperBowl
> > Half
> > > Time
> > > > Show!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > DKNUN
> > > > > > February 8th, 2010 at 1:19 am
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why do you edit out the points
> made in
> > the
> > > > comments
> > > > > you
> > > > > > receive?
> > > > > > You cannot edit the truth out of
> the
> > world.
> > > Why
> > > > not
> > > > > just
> > > > > > fix what you did?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >  « Previous Entries
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Good Will Win in the End
> > > > > > > Can a couple as mismatched as
> they
> > are
> > > find
> > > > > > happiness,
> > > > > > > while living through a very
> nasty
> > > > reelection
> > > > > campaign?
> > > > > > Or
> > > > > > > will they be
> > > > > > > torn apart?
> > > > > > > Read A Free Excerpt (PDF)
> > > > > > > Buy the Book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You are currently browsing
> the
> > > > > > > Rory’s Reflections weblog
> > archives
> > > for
> > > > > January,
> > > > > > 2010.
- Show quoted text -
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Pages
> > > > > > > BiographyArchives
> > > > > > > February 2010January
> 2010December
> > > > 2009November
> > > > > > 2009October
> > > > > > > 2009September 2009August
> 2009July
> > > 2009June
> > > > > 2009May
> > > > > > 2009March
> > > > > > > 2009February 2009January
> > 2009December
> > > > > 2008November
> > > > > > > 2008October 2008September
> > 2008August
> > > > 2008July
> > > > > > 2008June
> > > > > > > 2008May 2008April 2008March
> > > 2008February
> > > > > 2008January
> > > > > > > 2008December 2007November
> > 2007October
> > > > > 2007September
> > > > > > > 2007August 2007July 2007June
> > 2007May
> > > > 2007April
> > > > > > > 2007Categories
> > > > > > > Uncategorized
> > > > > > > Other Resources
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Weblog
> ReviewBlogoriffic.com
> > > Terrific
> > > > blog
> > > > > > directory
> > > > > > > and blogger network
> community.
> > > > > > > All-Blogs.net directoryBlog
> > Directory
> > > ©
> > > > 2010
> > > > > > Rory’s
> > > > > > > ReflectionsSupported by
> Maximum
> > Voice
> > > > Ventrilo
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>